June 2025 Paper 3 Q4
4. Kay is studying the variables Daily Total Sunshine (\(x\)) and Daily Total Rainfall (\(y\)) from the large data set for Leeming in 2015
Kay starts with 5th May and then selects every 10th day thereafter.
Kay wants to find the regression line of \(y\) on \(x\) for these data.
The equation of the regression line Kay finds is \(y = 0.741 + 0.199x\)
Kay’s teacher claimed that the greater the amount of sunshine in a day the lower the amount of rain there should be.
The teacher used all the data for these variables from the large data set for Leeming in 2015, as a sample.
The teacher calculated the product moment correlation coefficient for \(x\) and \(y\) to be \(-0.160\)
In a suitable test to determine whether there is evidence to support the teacher’s claim, the \(p\)-value was 0.015
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| Systematic (sampling) | B1 | 1.2 |
| (1) |
Notes
B1: for systematic (ignore other non-contradictory descriptions). Condone misspelling.
If a clear choice is given e.g. stratified or systematic we take the final answer.
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| The (Daily Total) Rainfall data may contain “tr” entries (these will need a suitable value substituted before calculations can take place.) | B1 | 2.4 |
| (1) |
Notes
B1: for mention of “tr” or “trace” entries in rain(fall) [ or \(y\)] data. Ignore “n/a”.
Ignore any comment about what to do with trace.
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| (i) mm/h (o.e.) e.g. \(\mathrm{mm\,h^{-1}}\) or \(\mathrm{mm\,hrs^{-1}}\) or \(\dfrac{\text{mm}}{\text{hours}}\) | B1 | 1.1b |
| (ii) When there is no sun(shine) there is (on average) 0.7(41) (mm) of rain or the amount of rain when there is no sun(shine) (o.e.) | B1 | 2.4 |
| (2) |
Notes
(i) B1: for mm/h or equivalent in words.
(ii) B1: for the idea of amount of rain when no sun. “Minimum rain” is B0
Don’t need value or units but if given must be correct or consistent with (i)
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| e.g. Not consistent (since); Kay’s line says positive correlation or gradient or regression coefficient or regression line or 0.199 is positive | B1 | 2.4 |
| (1) |
Notes
B1: for a suitable reason and saying not consistent (o.e.) e.g. “false” or “untrue” or “no”
Reason only needs to be about the line and may be a description e.g. as \(x\) increases \(y\) increases or at least 2 values of \(x\) substituted and \(y\) values evaluated
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| \(\mathrm{H}_0 : \rho = 0\) and \(\mathrm{H}_1 : \rho < 0\) | B1 | 2.5 |
| [\(p\)-value < 5% so significant result] there is evidence to support the teacher’s claim | B1 | 2.2b |
| (2) |
Notes
B1: for both hypotheses correct in terms of \(\rho\) (condone attempt at \(\rho\) that looks like \(p\))
B1: for a correct conclusion in context with no contradiction.
Using words “support” and “teacher’s claim”
or “negative correlation” and “sun or \(x\)” and “rain or \(y\)”
[If a comparison is given it must be \(0.015 < 0.05\)]
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| (i) The sample is rainfall (\(y\)) and sunshine (\(x\)) for May~Oct in (Leeming) in 2015 | B1 | 1.1b |
| (ii) e.g. (rainfall and sunshine) for: (Leeming) for all of 2015, or Leeming anytime (not just May~Oct) or Leeming for May~October for other years too or May~Oct in UK etc | B1 | 3.3 |
| (2) | ||
| (9 marks) |
Notes
(i) B1: for recognising that all the data/days for these variables in LDS for 2015 is the sample.
Condone omitting “Leeming”
B0 for “sunshine and rainfall for Leeming in 2015” It could be the population.
(ii) B1: for a suitable attempt to describe a population. The teacher’s sample must be a subset.