D2 June 2015 Q3
3.
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | – | \(x\) | 41 | 43 | 38 | 21 | 30 |
| B | \(x\) | – | 27 | 38 | 19 | 29 | 51 |
| C | 41 | 27 | – | 24 | 37 | 35 | 40 |
| D | 43 | 38 | 24 | – | 44 | 52 | 25 |
| E | 38 | 19 | 37 | 44 | – | 20 | 28 |
| F | 21 | 29 | 35 | 52 | 20 | – | 49 |
| G | 30 | 51 | 40 | 25 | 28 | 49 | – |
The network represented by the table shows the least distances, in km, between seven theatres, A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
Jasmine needs to visit each theatre at least once starting and finishing at A. She wishes to minimise the total distance she travels. The least distance between A and B, is \(x\) km, where \(21 \lt x \lt 27\)
You should list the arcs in the order in which you consider them. (2)
The nearest neighbour algorithm starting at F gives a route of F – E – B – A – G – D – C – F.
Starting by deleting A, and all of its arcs, a lower bound of 159 km for the length of the route is found.
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| Prim: AF, EF, BE, BC, CD, DG | M1 A1 |
| (2) |
Notes
a1M1: Must be using Prim’s algorithm not NNA – if any arc creates a cycle then M0. First four arcs (or all 7 nodes / or numbers across the top of the matrix) selected correctly. Award M1 only for a correct tree with no working. Award M1 only for the first four arcs (oe) selected correctly if starting at a different node than A
a1A1: CAO (order of arc selection clear)
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| 2 × 136 = 272 (km) | B1 |
| (1) |
Notes
b1B1: CAO (272)
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| A F E B C D G A | B1 |
| 21 20 19 27 24 25 30 = 166 (km) | B1 |
| (2) |
Notes
c1B1: CAO – must be either in terms of nodes or arcs (not weights)
c2B1: CAO (166)
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| Starting at F route length is \(153 + x\) | B1 |
| With \(x \gt 21\), \(153 + x\) is greater than 166 so the better upper bound is the one starting at A | DB1 |
| (2) |
Notes
d1B1: Either \(153 + x\) or states a value in the interval 174 < value < 180 or considers one of the intervals 174 < value < 180 or 175 \(\leqslant\) value \(\leqslant\) 179
d2DB1: Correct argument that A gives the better upper bound. Must be considering either \(x \gt 21\) or \(x \geqslant 22\) with 153 (so expect to see as a minimum the mention of > 174 or \(\geqslant\) 175) – must be clear that the upper bound starting at A is the better upper bound. This mark is dependent on the previous B mark in (d)
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| Length of RMST = 115 | B1 |
| \(115 + 21 + x = 159 \therefore x = 23\) (km) | M1 A1 |
| (3) |
Notes
e1B1: CAO (length of RMST) – the length (115 or 19 + 20 + 27 + 24 + 25) must be either explicitly stated or seen in their working (not just implied by their working)
e1M1: Adding the correct two least values (21 and \(x\)) to their RMST length (their RMST may be incorrect but must contain only 5 arcs) and equating to 159. Accept, for example, \(136 + x = 159\) or \(136 + 23 = 159\) or \(115 + 21 + 23 = 159\) or equivalent calculations using the length of their RMST
e1A1: CAO (must be clear that (\(x\) =) 23 not just embedded in a calculation)
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| 159 \(\leqslant\) optimal \(\leqslant\) 166 [accept 159 < optimal \(\leqslant\) 166] | B2,1,0 |
| (2) | |
| 12 marks |
Notes
f1B1: Any indication of an interval containing 159 (as a lower bound) and their stated better upper bound from (d)
f2B1: CAO either 159 \(\leqslant\) optimal (oe) \(\leqslant\) 166 or 159 < optimal (oe) \(\leqslant\) 166