C3 January 2012 Q6
6. \[\mathrm{f}(x) = x^2 - 3x + 2\cos\left(\tfrac{1}{2}x\right), \quad 0 \leqslant x \leqslant \pi\]
The curve with equation \(y = \mathrm{f}(x)\) has a minimum point \(P\).
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| f(0.8) = 0.082, f(0.9)= -0.089 | M1 |
| Change of sign \(\Rightarrow\) root (0.8,0.9) | A1 |
| (2) |
Notes
M1 Calculates both f(0.8) and f(0.9). Evidence of this mark could be, either, seeing both ‘x’ substitutions written out in the expression, or, one value correct to 1 sig fig, or the appearance of incorrect values of f(0.8)=awrt 0.2 or f(0.9)=awrt 0.1 from use of degrees
A1 This requires both values to be correct as well as a reason and a conclusion.
Accept f(0.8)= 0.08 truncated or rounded (2dp) or 0.1 rounded (1dp) and f(0.9)=-0.08 truncated or rounded as -0.09 (2dp) or -0.1(1dp)
Acceptable reasons are change of sign, <0 >0, +ve –ve, f(0.8)f(0.9)<0. Acceptable conclusion is hence root or □
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| \(f'(x) = 2x - 3 - \sin\left(\dfrac{1}{2}x\right)\) | M1 A1 |
| Sets \(f'(x) = 0 \Rightarrow \quad x = \dfrac{3 + \sin\left(\frac{1}{2}x\right)}{2}\) | M1A1* |
| (4) |
Notes
M1 Attempts to differentiate f(x). Seeing any of 2x,3 or \(\pm A\sin(\tfrac{1}{2}x)\) is sufficient evidence.
A1 f’(x) correct. Accept \(\dfrac{dy}{dx} = 2x - 3 - \sin\left(\frac{1}{2}x\right)\)
M1 Sets their f’(x)=0 and proceeds to x=….. You must be sure that they are setting what they think is f’(x)=0.
Accept \(2x = 3 + \sin\left(\frac{1}{2}x\right)\) going to x=..only if f’(x) =0 is stated first
A1 * \(x = \dfrac{3 + \sin\left(\frac{1}{2}x\right)}{2}\). This is a given answer so don’t accept just the sight of this answer. It is cso
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| Sub \(x_0 = 2\) into \(x_{n+1} = \dfrac{3 + \sin\left(\frac{1}{2}x_n\right)}{2}\) | M1 |
| \(x_1 = \text{awrt } 1.921\), \(x_2 = \text{awrt } 1.91(0)\) and \(x_3 = \text{awrt } 1.908\) | A1,A1 |
| (3) |
Notes
M1 Substitutes \(x_0 = 2\) into \(x_{n+1} = \dfrac{3 + \sin\left(\frac{1}{2}x_n\right)}{2}\). Evidence of this mark could be awrt 1.9 or 1.5 (from degrees)
A1 \(x_1 = \text{awrt } 1.921\)
A1 \(x_2 = \text{awrt } 1.91(0)\) and \(x_3 = \text{awrt } 1.908\)
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| [1.90775,1.90785] | M1 |
| f’(1.90775)=-0.00016.. AND f’(1.90785)= 0.0000076.. | M1 |
| Change of sign \(\Rightarrow\) x=1.9078 | A1 |
| (3) | |
| (12 marks) |
Notes
Continued iteration is not acceptable for this part. Question states ‘By choosing a suitable interval…’
M1 Chooses the interval [1.90775,1.90785] or tighter containing the root= 1.907845522
M1 Calculates f’(1.90775) and f’(1.90785) or tighter with at least one correct, rounded or truncated
f’(1.90775)=-0.0001 truncated or awrt -0.0002 rounded
f’(1.90785)= 0.000007 truncated or awrt 0.000008 rounded
Accept versions of g(x)-x where \(g(x) = \dfrac{3 + \sin\left(\frac{1}{2}x\right)}{2}\).
When x= 1.90775, \(g(x) - x = 8 \times 10^{-5}\) rounded and truncated
When x= 1.90785, \(g(x) - x = -3 \times 10^{-6}\) truncated or \(= -4 \times 10^{-6}\) rounded
A1 Both values correct, rounded or truncated, a valid reason (see part a) and a minimal conclusion (see part a). Saying hence root is acceptable. There is no need to refer to the ‘turning point’.