June 2019 Paper 3 Q4
4. Magali is studying the mean total cloud cover, in oktas, for Leuchars in 1987 using data from the large data set. The daily mean total cloud cover for all 184 days from the large data set is summarised in the table below.
| Daily mean total cloud cover (oktas) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency (number of days) | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 30 | 52 | 52 | 28 |
One of the 184 days is selected at random.
Magali is investigating whether the daily mean total cloud cover can be modelled using a binomial distribution.
She uses the random variable \(X\) to denote the daily mean total cloud cover and believes that \(X \sim \mathrm{B}(8,\ 0.76)\)
Using Magali’s model,
There were 28 days that had a daily mean total cloud cover of 8
For these 28 days the daily mean total cloud cover for the following day is shown in the table below.
| Daily mean total cloud cover (oktas) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency (number of days) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 9 |
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| \(\dfrac{132}{184} = 0.71739\ldots\) awrt 0.717 | B1 | 1.1b |
| (1) |
Notes
Allow fractions, decimals or percentages throughout this question.
Allow equivalent fraction, e.g. \(\frac{33}{46}\)
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| (i) \(\mathrm{P}(X \geqslant 6) = 1 - \mathrm{P}(X \leqslant 5)\) or \(\mathrm{P}([X =]6) + \mathrm{P}([X =]7) + \mathrm{P}([X =]8)\) | M1 | 3.4 |
| \(= 1 - 0.296722\ldots\) awrt 0.703 | A1 | 1.1b |
| (2) | ||
| (ii) \(184 \times \mathrm{P}(X = 7)\) \([= 184 \times 0.2811\ldots]\) | M1 | 1.1b |
| \(= 51.7385\ldots\) awrt 51.7 | A1 | 1.1b |
| (2) |
Notes
(b)(i) M1: for writing or using \(1 - \mathrm{P}(X \leqslant 5)\) or \(\mathrm{P}(X = 6) + \mathrm{P}(X = 7) + \mathrm{P}(X = 8)\)
A1: awrt 0.703 (correct answer scores 2 out of 2)
(b)(ii) M1: for \(184 \times \mathrm{P}(X = 7)\) o.e. e.g., \(184 \times [\mathrm{P}(X \leqslant 7) - \mathrm{P}(X \leqslant 6)]\)
A1: awrt 51.7
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| Part (a) and part (b)(i) are similar and the expected number of 7s (51.7 or 0.281) matches with the number of 7s found in the data set (52 or 0.283) so Magali’s model is supported. | B1ft | 3.5a |
| (1) |
Notes
B1ft: comparing ‘0.717’ with ‘0.703’ and ’51.7 or ‘0.281’ with 52 or 0.283 and concluding that Magali’s model is supported (must be comparing prob. with prob. and days with days). Allow not supported or mixed conclusions if consistent with their f.t. answers in (a) and (b)
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| \(\dfrac{23}{28} = 0.82142\ldots\) awrt 0.821 | B1 | 1.1b |
| (1) |
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
Any one of…
| B1 | 2.4 |
| …therefore Magali’s (binomial) model may not be suitable. | dB1 | 3.5a |
| (2) | ||
| (9 marks) |
Notes
B1: Any bullet point
dB1: (dep on previous B1) for Magali’s model may not be suitable (o.e.)
Condone not accurate for not suitable
SC: part (d) is similar to part (a)/(b)(i) and a compatible conclusion (i.e. Magali’s model is supported) to score B1B1.