S1 June 2006 Q2
2. Sunita and Shelley talk to one another once a week on the telephone. Over many weeks they recorded, to the nearest minute, the number of minutes spent in conversation on each occasion. The following table summarises their results.
| Time (to the nearest minute) | Number of Conversations |
|---|---|
| 5–9 | 2 |
| 10–14 | 9 |
| 15–19 | 20 |
| 20–24 | 13 |
| 25–29 | 8 |
| 30–34 | 3 |
Two of the conversations were chosen at random.
The mid-point of each class was represented by \(x\) and its corresponding frequency by \(f\), giving \(\Sigma fx = 1060\).
During the following 25 weeks they monitored their weekly conversations and found that at the end of the 80 weeks their overall mean length of conversation was 21 minutes.
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| \(\mathrm{P}(\text{both longer than } 24.5) = \dfrac{11}{55} \times \dfrac{10}{54} = \dfrac{1}{27}\) or \(0.\dot{0}3\dot{7}\) or 0.037 | M1A1 |
| (2) |
Notes
M1 2 fracs × w/o rep.
A1 awrt 0.037
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| Estimate of mean time spent on their conversations is \(\bar{x} = \dfrac{1060}{55} = 19\tfrac{3}{11}\) or \(19.\dot{2}\dot{7}\) or 19.3 | M1A1 |
| (2) |
Notes
M1A1 1060/total, awrt 19.3 or 19mins 16s
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| \(\dfrac{1060 + \sum fy}{80} = 21\) | B1 |
| \(\sum fy = 620\) | M1 |
| \(\therefore \bar{y} = \dfrac{620}{25} = 24.8\) | M1A1 |
| (4) |
Notes
B1 \(21 \times 80 = 1680\)
M1 Subtracting ‘their 1060’
M1A1 Dividing their 620 by 25
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| Increase in mean value. | B1 |
| Length of conversations increased considerably during 25 weeks relative to 55 weeks | B1ft |
| (2) | |
| (10 marks) |
Notes
B1ft context – ft only from comment above