Foundation June 2023 Paper 3 Q19
19 A bag contains 150 counters.
The counters are either red or yellow.
They do this nine times.
Here are Riley’s results.

Use Riley’s results to work out how many red counters are likely to be in the bag. [3]
Here are Ling’s results.

Use Ling’s results to estimate the probability of choosing a red counter from the bag.
Give your answer as a fraction in its simplest form. [2]
| Answer | Marks | Part marks and guidance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 83 or 84 | 3 | M2 for \(150 \times \dfrac{5}{9}\) oe implied by answer 83.3… or M1 for \(\dfrac{5}{9}\) or for \(\dfrac{150}{9}\) | Non calculator methods must be fully correct, see appendix, and would lead to 83.3 May be implied by 0.55 to 0.56 or 55% to 56% May be implied by 16.6 to 16.7 |
Appendix
Non Calculator methods for percentages.
Labels only
This is when labels such as 10% = are used.
If only labels are used the final answer scores full marks if it is correct.
Condone a numerical slip if the answer is correct.
If there is an error in the values and so the final answer is incorrect this cannot score method marks
e.g. Find 65% of 60
Method scoring M1A1
10% = 6
5% = 3
50% = 30
65% = 39 ✓ M1A1
10% = 6
5% = 4 ✗ condone this slip as answer correct
50% = 30
65% = 39 ✓ M1A1
Method scoring M0A0
10% = 6
5% = 4 ✗ M0 Do not condone this slip as answer incorrect
50% = 30
65% = 40 ✗
Build up method
This is where the candidate finds the percentages to build up to the required value but shows the operations used.
e.g. Find 65% of 60
10% = \(60 \div 10 = x\)
5% = \(x \div 2 = y\)
50% = \(x \times 5 = z\)
65% = \(x + z + y\)
Because the operations have been shown and they are correct, if there is an error in one of \(x\), \(y\) or \(z\), method marks can still be earned
| Answer | Marks | Part marks and guidance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| \(\dfrac{3}{5}\) | 2 | B1 for \(\dfrac{12}{20}\) oe | For B1 accept 0.6 or 60% or \(\dfrac{12}{20} \times 150\) |
| Answer | Marks | Part marks and guidance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Ling has] more results [than Riley] oe | 1 | See appendix Accept he/they/she as reference to Ling May be inverse: [Riley has] fewer results [than Ling] oe Do not accept comments about more/less in the bag | |
Appendix
Question 19c
| Response | Mark | |
|---|---|---|
| Ling chose more counters | 1 | |
| There is more counters | BOD as does not say “in the bag” and could mean “in the sample” | 1 bod |
| Lin picked more times | 1 | |
| Ling took more samples | 1 | |
| Ling took a larger sample | Could mention numbers such as “more than 9” | 1 |
| She has more in the tally | BOD | 1 |
| Ling did it 20 times and Riley did it 9 times | BOD a comparison (would be better if “only” included) | 1 |
| There are more counters in the bag | This is untrue | 0 |
| Ling did it multiple times | Not a comparison (we have to do the comparing) | 0 |
| Ling did it 20 times | Not a comparison (we have to do the comparing) | 0 |