S3 June 2012 Q5
5. Mr Alan and Ms Burns are two Mathematics teachers teaching mixed ability groups of students in a large college. At the end of the college year all students took the same examination. A random sample of 29 of Mr Alan’s students and a random sample of 26 of Ms Burns’ students are chosen. The results are summarised in the table below.
| Sample Size, \(n\) | Mean, \(\bar{x}\) | Standard Deviation, \(s\) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Alan | 29 | 80 | 10 |
| Ms Burns | 26 | 74 | 15 |
Ms Burns thinks the comparison was unfair as the examination was set by Mr Alan. She looks up a different set of examination results for these students and, although Mr Alan’s sample has a higher mean, she calculates the test statistic for this new set of results to be 1.6
However, Mr Alan now claims that the mean marks of his students are higher than the mean marks of Ms Burns’ students.
Use a 10% level of significance. (3)
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| \(\mathrm{H}_0 : \mu_A = \mu_B\) \(\mathrm{H}_1 : \mu_A \ne \mu_B\) | B1 |
| \(z = \dfrac{\pm(80 - 74)}{\sqrt{\dfrac{100}{29} + \dfrac{225}{26}}}\) | M1A1 |
| \(z = \pm 1.7247\ldots\) awrt \(\pm\)1.72 | A1 |
| \(1.7247 \gt 1.6449\) o.e. so reject \(H_0\) | dM1 |
| There is evidence of a difference in the (mean) scores of their students. | A1 |
| (6) |
Notes
1st M1 for attempt at s.e. (condone one number wrong) and for using their s.e. in correct formula for test statistic.
1st A1 for correct expression for se
2nd dM1 dep. on 1st M1 for a correct statement based on their normal cv and their test statistic
3rd A1 for correct comment in context. Must mention “scores” and “students / groups/classes” Award A0 for a one-tailed comment.
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| (For \(z = 1.6\), test above not significant so no evidence of a difference.) For Mr A’s claim, \(\mathrm{H}_0 : \mu_A = \mu_B\), \(\mathrm{H}_1 : \mu_A \gt \mu_B\), and critical value is \(z = 1.2816\) | B1, B1 |
| (Both \(z\) values significant,) Mr Alan’s claim supported. | B1 |
| (3) | |
| (9 marks) |
Notes
1st B1 Alternative hyp should be clearly defined