S3 June 2007 Q4
4. A quality control manager regularly samples 20 items from a production line and records the number of defective items \(x\). The results of 100 such samples are given in Table 1 below.
| \(x\) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 or more |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | 17 | 31 | 19 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 0 |
Table 1
The manager claimed that the number of defective items in a sample of 20 can be modelled by a binomial distribution. He used the answer in part (a) to calculate the expected frequencies given in Table 2.
| \(x\) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 or more |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expected frequency | 12.2 | 27.0 | \(r\) | 19.0 | \(s\) | 3.2 | 0.9 | 0.2 |
Table 2
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| \(\dfrac{0 \times 17 + 1 \times 31 + \ldots}{17 + 31 + \ldots} = \left(\dfrac{200}{100} = 2\right)\), \(\hat{p} = \dfrac{2}{20} = \underline{0.1}\) (Accept \(\dfrac{2}{20}\) or 2 per 20) | M1, A1 |
| (2) |
Notes
M1 for attempt to find mean or \(\hat{p}\) (as printed or better). The 0.1 must be seen in part (a).
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| e.g. \(r = 100 \times \dbinom{20}{2}(0.1)^2(0.9)^{18}\) | M1 |
| \(r = 28.5\), \(s\) = AWRT 9 | A1, A1 |
| (3) |
Notes
M1 for correct expression for \(r\) or \(s\) using the binomial distribution. Follow through their \(\hat{p}\).
| Scheme | Marks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| \(\displaystyle\sum \frac{(O - E)^2}{E} =\) AWRT 9.4 | M1A1c.a.o. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| \(\nu = 5 - 2 = 3, \quad \chi^2_3(5\%) = 7.815\) | B1ft, B1ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| \(\mathrm{H}_0\) : Binomial distribution is a good/suitable model/fit [Condone: B(20, 0.1) is…] \(\mathrm{H}_1\) : Binomial distribution is not a suitable model both | B1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Significant result) Binomial distribution is not a suitable model | A1cao | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (7) |
Notes
1st M1 for some pooling (accept \(x \geqslant 5\), obs.freq. …14, 9, 10 and exp.freq. 19.0, \(s\), 4.3)
2nd M1 for calculation of test statistic (N.B. \(x \geqslant 5\) gives 14.5). One correct term seen.
1st B1ft for number of classes – 2 (N.B. \(x \geqslant 5\) will have 6 – 2 = 4)
2nd B1ft for the appropriate tables value, ft their degrees of freedom. (NB \(\chi^2_4(5\%) = 9.488\))
3rd B1 (for hypotheses) allow just “\(X \sim \mathrm{B}(20, 0.1)\)” for null etc.
2nd A1 for correctly rejecting Binomial model. No ft and depends on 2nd M1.
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| defective items do not occur independently or not with constant probability | B1ft |
| (1) | |
| (13 marks) |
Notes
B1ft for independence or constant probability – must mention defective items or defectives
Follow through their conclusion in (c). So if they do not reject they may say “defectives occur with probability 0.1”. Stating the value implies constant probability.