D2 June 2012 Q3
3. The table below shows the cost, in pounds, of transporting one tonne of concrete from each of three supply depots, A, B and C, to each of four building sites, D, E, F and G. It also shows the number of tonnes that can be supplied from each depot and the number of tonnes required at each building site. A minimum cost solution is required.
| D | E | F | G | Supply | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 17 | 19 | 21 | 20 | 18 |
| B | 21 | 20 | 19 | 22 | 23 |
| C | 18 | 17 | 16 | 21 | 29 |
| Demand | 15 | 24 | 18 | 13 |
The north-west corner method gives the following possible solution.
| D | E | F | G | Supply | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 15 | 3 | 18 | ||
| B | 21 | 2 | 23 | ||
| C | 16 | 13 | 29 | ||
| Demand | 15 | 24 | 18 | 13 |
Taking AG as the first entering cell,
| Scheme | Marks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M1 1A1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2M1 2A1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Improvement indices: AF = 21 – 0 – 15 = 6 BD = 21 – 1 – 17 = 3 BF = 19 – 1 – 15 = 3 BG = 22 – 1 – 20 = 1 CD = 18 – 1 – 17 = 0 CE = 17 – 1 – 19 = −3 | 3A1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entering square CE
| 3M1 4A1ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5A1 cso | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (8) |
Notes
Some candidates are starting by confirming that they should use AG as their first entering square. So if the candidate starts by finding initial shadow costs and II’s to confirm that AG has the most negative II, ignore this work and start marking from their first route. Do not credit shadow costs and IIs found here.
a1M1 A valid route, AG used as the empty square, \(\theta\)’s balance. If AG not used mark as a misread.
a1A1 A correct route, correctly stating exiting cell, up to my improved solution with no extra zeros.
a2M1 Finding 7 shadow costs and 6 IIs.
a2A1 Shadow costs CAO [Alt: A(17), B(18), C(18), D(0), E(2), F(−2), G(3)]
a3A1 Improvement indices CAO
a3M1 A valid route, their most negative II chosen, only one empty square used, \(\theta\)’s balance.
a4A1ft a correct route, correctly stating entering cell, exiting cell.
a5A1 CSO, my solution no extra zeros.
| Scheme | Marks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M1 1A1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Improvement indices: AE = 19 – 0 – 16 = 3 AF = 21 – 0 – 15 = 6 BD = 21 – 4 – 17 = 0 BF = 19 – 4 – 15 = 0 BG = 22 – 4 – 20 = −2 CD = 18 – 1 – 17 = 0 | 2A1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Not optimal since a negative improvement index | 3A1ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (12 marks) |
Notes
b1M1 Finding 7 shadow costs and all 6 IIs or at least 1 negative II found.
b1A1 Shadow costs CAO [Alt SC: A(17), B(21), C(18), D(0), E(−1), F(−2), G(3)]
b2A1 BG = −2 found as an II.
b3A1ft CAO + conclusion. If candidates go on to perform a third iteration and determine that it is optimal, please allow this final mark. Must make link between negative II and not optimal.
(Some glyphs are missing in the printed scheme’s tables; they are typed here from the working.)