A2 June 2025 Q2
2. Two lecturers are marking a large batch of students’ essays, to place them in rank order.
A random sample of 9 students is taken and their essays are marked by both lecturers.
The marks awarded are given in the table below.
| Student | \(A\) | \(B\) | \(C\) | \(D\) | \(E\) | \(F\) | \(G\) | \(H\) | \(I\) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lecturer 1 | 10 | 16 | 5 | 17 | 12 | 7 | 14 | 11 | 8 |
| Lecturer 2 | 17 | 22 | 19 | 24 | 21 | 15 | 23 | 18 | 20 |
| Scheme | Marks | AO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | 1.1b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| \(\sum d^2 = 4 + 1 + 9 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 1 + 4 + 4\ \ (= 24)\) | dM1 | 1.1b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| \(r_s = 1 - \dfrac{6 \times \text{“}24\text{”}}{9 \times (9^2 - 1)}\) | M1 | 1.1b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| \(= \dfrac{4}{5}\) or 0.8 | A1 | 1.1b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (4) |
Notes
1st M1: for an attempt to rank marks (at least 5 correct in one row) Allow reverse ranking. May be implied by 24
2nd dM1: dep on 1st M1 for attempt at calculating \(d^2\) (does not need to be summed). (Allow 1 error squaring their differences)
May be implied by 24
3rd M1: indep of first two Ms for using correct formula with their \(12 \lt \sum d^2 \lt 240\)
May be implied by 0.8 o.e.
A1: for 0.8 o.e.
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| \(\mathrm{H}_0 : \rho = 0 \qquad \mathrm{H}_1 : \rho \gt 0\) | B1 | 2.5 |
| cv one tail 5% = 0.6 | M1 | 3.4 |
| (Significant result so there is evidence that) the lecturers agree about the rank order of the essays. | A1 | 2.2b |
| (3) | ||
| (7 marks) |
Notes
B1: for both hypotheses correct in terms of \(\rho\) or \(\rho_s\) (condone if it appears as \(p\)). Do not allow hypotheses in words on their own.
M1: for selecting the correct critical value. Allow \(\pm\)
If they scored B0 for 2-tail test allow 0.7
A1: dep on \(0.7 \lt \text{“}0.8\text{”} \lt 1\) for a correct conclusion in context stating agreement (or agree) between lecturers. Do not allow correlation for agreement (not contextual)
Can award this mark independently of hypotheses.
Do NOT award this mark if contradictory statements are seen e.g. not significant so lecturers agree.
If a comparison is made then it must be correct.
Note that M0A1 is not possible