AS June 2019 Q1
1. A leisure club offers a choice of one of three activities to its 150 members on a Tuesday evening. The manager believes that there may be an association between the choice of activity and the age of the member and collected the following data.
| Activity Age \(a\) years | Badminton | Bowls | Snooker |
|---|---|---|---|
| \(a \lt 20\) | 9 | 3 | 3 |
| \(20 \leqslant a \lt 40\) | 10 | 10 | 14 |
| \(40 \leqslant a \lt 50\) | 16 | 15 | 5 |
| \(50 \leqslant a \lt 60\) | 15 | 13 | 11 |
| \(a \geqslant 60\) | 4 | 19 | 3 |
The manager calculated expected frequencies to use in the test.
The test statistic used to test the manager’s belief is 19.583
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| \(\mathrm{H}_0\): There is no association between age and activity \(\mathrm{H}_1\): There is an association between age and activity | B1 | 1.2 |
| (1) |
Notes
B1 for both hypotheses in terms of “association” or “independence”. Must mention age and activity (or sport). [Use of “relationship” or “link” here is B0 but allow for last B1ft]
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| \(\dfrac{26 \times 36}{150} = 6.24\) | B1 | 1.1b |
| (1) |
Notes
B1 for 6.24
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| Since expected value in \(a \lt 20\) and snooker \(= 3.6 \lt 5\) we amalgamate two rows | B1 | 2.4 |
| Table is now \(4 \times 3\) so degrees of freedom is \((4-1) \times (3-1) = 6\) (*) | B1* | 1.1b |
| (2) |
Notes
1st B1 for a reason to get a 4 x 3 table based on amalgamation of rows
Must mention \(a \lt 20\) and snooker and see 3.6 and be combining rows (not columns)
2nd B1* for 6 degrees of freedom clearly coming from a 4 x 3 table formed from amalgamation of rows. [ 8 – 2 = 6 is B0 ]
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| Critical value \(\chi^2_6(5\%) = 12.592\) | B1 | 1.1b |
| [Significant result]: so there is evidence to support manager’s belief | B1ft | 2.2b |
| (2) | ||
| (6 marks) |
Notes
1st B1 for correct critical value (allow 12.6 or 12.59 or awrt 12.592)
NB \(p\)-value \(= 0.0032839\ldots\) so allow awrt 0.00328
2nd B1ft for a correct comparison and conclusion (ft their cv) [Independent of hypotheses]
e.g. there is an “association” or “relationship” or “link” between age and activity is OK
BUT there is a “correlation” between age and activity is B0
Do not accept contradictory contextual statements e.g. “manager’s belief supported , there is no association between age and activity”