S4 June 2015 Q3
3. As part of their research two sports science students, Ali and Bea, select a random sample of 10 adult male swimmers and a random sample of 13 adult male athletes from local sports clubs. They measure the arm span, \(x\) cm, of each person selected.
The data are summarised in the table below
| \(n\) | \(s^2\) | \(\bar{x}\) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swimmers | 10 | 48 | 195 |
| Athletes | 13 | 161 | 186 |
The students know that the arm spans of adult male swimmers and of adult male athletes may each be assumed to be normally distributed.
They decide to share out the data analysis, with Ali investigating the means of the two distributions and Bea investigating the variances of the two distributions.
Ali assumes that the variances of the two distributions are equal. She calculates the pooled estimate of variance, \({s_p}^2\)
Ali claims that there is no difference in the mean arm spans of adult male swimmers and of adult male athletes.
Bea believes that the variances of the arm spans of adult male swimmers and adult male athletes are not equal.
Ali and Bea combine their work and present their results to their tutor, Clive.
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| \({s_p}^2 = \dfrac{12 \times 161 + 9 \times 48}{13 + 10 - 2} = \dfrac{2364}{21} = 112.571\ldots = 112.6\ (1\text{dp})\) | M1A1cso |
| (2) |
Notes
M1 for \(\dfrac{12 \times 161 + 9 \times 48}{13 + 10 - 2}\)
A1cso need to get awrt112.57 or \(\dfrac{2364}{21}\) then write 112.6
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| To test \(\mathrm{H}_0 : \mu_s = \mu_a\) against \(\mathrm{H}_1 : \mu_s \ne \mu_a\) (o.e.) | B1 |
| Test stat, \(t = \pm\dfrac{195 - 186}{\sqrt{112.57\ldots\left(\frac{1}{10} + \frac{1}{13}\right)}} = \pm 2.016\ldots\) (awrt2.02) | M1A1 |
| Critical values, \(t_{21} = (\pm)1.721\) | B1 |
| In critical region, therefore significant evidence to reject \(\mathrm{H}_0\) and accept \(\mathrm{H}_1\) Evidence of difference in mean arm span of adult male swimmers and adult male athletes or No evidence to support Ali’s claim. | A1 |
| (5) |
Notes
M1 \(\dfrac{195 - 186}{\sqrt{112.6\left(\frac{1}{10} + \frac{1}{13}\right)}}\)
2nd B1 alternate method, \(p\) value of 0.0566 in place of critical value
Final A1 requires correct conclusion in context
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| To test \(\mathrm{H}_0 : {\sigma_s}^2 = {\sigma_a}^2\) against \(\mathrm{H}_1 : {\sigma_s}^2 \ne {\sigma_a}^2\) | B1 |
| Test stat, \(F_{12,9} = \dfrac{161}{48} = 3.354\ldots\) \(\left(\dfrac{1}{\mathrm{F}_{12,9}} = \dfrac{48}{161} = 0.2981\ldots\right)\) | M1A1 |
| Critical value, \(F_{12,9} = 3.07\ (0.3257\ldots)\) | B1 |
| In critical region, therefore significant evidence to reject \(\mathrm{H}_0\) and accept \(\mathrm{H}_1\) Evidence of difference in variance of arm span of adult male swimmers and adult male athletes or the data supports Bea’s belief | A1cso |
| (5) |
Notes
1st B1 allow \(\mathrm{H}_0 : \sigma_s = \sigma_a\) against \(\mathrm{H}_1 : \sigma_s \ne \sigma_a\)
M1 allow \(\dfrac{161^2}{48^2}\) if they write the formula down
Final A1 requires correct conclusion
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| Should do test for variance first as equal variances is necessary assumption for \(t\) test for means | B1 |
| but is not supported in (c), so result in (b) is invalid. | B1d |
| (2) | |
| (14 marks) |
Notes
1st B1 equal variances is necessary assumption (may be implied by saying not equal)
2nd B1d but not supported in (c)/(variances not equal) therefore (b) result invalid