S3 June 2017 Q3
3. A junior judge is being trained by a senior judge to learn how to assess ice skaters. After the training, the judges each assess 6 ice skaters \(A\), \(B\), \(C\), \(D\), \(E\) and \(F\). They each list them in order of preference with the best ice skater first. The results are shown in the table below.
| Rank | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Judge | \(A\) | \(B\) | \(D\) | \(C\) | \(F\) | \(E\) |
| Junior Judge | \(B\) | \(D\) | \(A\) | \(F\) | \(C\) | \(E\) |
| Scheme | Marks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1A1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| \(\sum d^2 = 8\) or 62 | A1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| \(r_s = 1 - \dfrac{6 \times 8}{6 \times 35} = \dfrac{27}{35} = 0.771\) | dM1A1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (5) |
Notes
M1 for an attempt to rank judges lists ( at least 4 correct for each judge)
A1 for correct rankings for both (may be reversed). Can be implied by correct \(d^2\) or \(r_s\)
N.B. Table could be ordered in terms of Senior Judge.
A1 8 or 62 or correct \(d^2\) row
M1 for use of the correct formula, follow through their \(\sum d^2\) (Dependent on 1st M1)
If answer is not correct, a correct expression is required.
A1 exact fraction or awrt (\(\pm\))0.771
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| \(\mathrm{H}_0 : \rho = 0\) \(\mathrm{H}_1 : \rho \gt 0\) | B1 |
| Critical value \(\pm 0.8286\) | B1 |
| (0.771<0.8286) so insufficient evidence to reject \(\mathrm{H}_0\) | M1 |
| There is insufficient evidence to suggest a positive correlation between the judges. | A1 ft |
| (4) |
Notes
B1 Both hypotheses in terms of \(\rho\) or \(\rho_s\). Hypotheses just in words e.g. “no correlation” score B0
B1 Accept \(\pm 0.8857\) if 2-tailed \(\mathrm{H}_1\).
M1 Follow through their \(r_s\) and their c.v. if |cv| <1 and \(|r_s| \lt 1\)
A1 ft A correct contextualised comment that includes “judges”.
| Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|
| (For positive correlation c.v.is 0.8286>0.771) | |
| Training of junior judge was ineffective. | B1 ft |
| (1) | |
| (10 marks) |
Notes
B1 ft o.e. Follow through from their cv and \(r_s\)