A2 June 2023 Q3
3. The table below shows the stock held at each supply point and the stock required at each demand point in a standard transportation problem. The table also shows the cost, in pounds, of transporting the stock from each supply point to each demand point.
| Q | R | S | Supply | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 23 | 18 | 12 | 45 |
| B | 8 | 10 | 14 | 27 |
| C | 11 | 14 | 21 | 34 |
| D | 19 | 15 | 11 | 50 |
| Demand | 75 | 37 | 44 |
The problem is partially described by the linear programming formulation below.
Let \(x_{ij}\) be the number of units transported from \(i\) to \(j\)
where \(\quad i \in \{\text{A, B, C, D}\}\)
\(\qquad\quad\ j \in \{\text{Q, R, S}\}\) and \(x_{ij} \geqslant 0\)
Minimise \(P = 23x_{\text{AQ}} + 18x_{\text{AR}} + 12x_{\text{AS}} + 8x_{\text{BQ}} + 10x_{\text{BR}} + 14x_{\text{BS}}\)
\(\qquad\qquad + 11x_{\text{CQ}} + 14x_{\text{CR}} + 21x_{\text{CS}} + 19x_{\text{DQ}} + 15x_{\text{DR}} + 11x_{\text{DS}}\)
- shadow costs
- improvement indices
- entering cell and exiting cell
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| \(\sum x_{\text{A}j} \leqslant 45 \quad \sum x_{\text{B}j} \leqslant 27 \quad \sum x_{\text{C}j} \leqslant 34 \quad \sum x_{\text{D}j} \leqslant 50\) \(\sum x_{i\text{Q}} \geqslant 75 \quad \sum x_{i\text{R}} \geqslant 37 \quad \sum x_{i\text{S}} \geqslant 44\) | M1 A1 | 3.3 2.5 |
| (2) |
Notes
M1: At least five equations or inequalities with unit coefficients (with at least 3 correct)
A1: CAO must be inequalities – check signs and notation carefully. If individual terms written out in full check suffices.
| Scheme | Marks | AO | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 1.1b | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) |
Notes
B1: CAO for north-west corner method
| Scheme | Marks | AO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 A1 | 2.1 2.2a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (2) |
Notes
M1: A valid route shown, AS chosen as entering cell, only one empty square used, \(\theta\)s balance
A1: CAO (with no zero in cell CR)
| Scheme | Marks | AO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 A1 | 2.1 1.1b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| M1 A1 | 1.1b 2.2a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (9 marks) |
Notes
M1: Finding 7 shadow costs and 6 improvement indices (no additional zeroes but condone if clearly differentiated)
A1: CAO (Alternative shadow costs: columns 0, -7, -11 rows 23, 8, 11, 22)
M1: A valid route shown, their most negative II chosen, only one empty square used, \(\theta\)s balance
A1: cao – including the deduction of both entering and exiting cells