AS June 2024 Q4
4. Robin shoots 8 arrows at a target each day for 100 days.
The number of times he hits the target each day is summarised in the table below.
| Number of hits | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | 1 | 10 | 30 | 34 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Misha believes that these data can be modelled by a binomial distribution.
Misha calculates expected frequencies, to 2 decimal places, as follows.
| Number of hits | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expected frequency | 2.81 | 12.67 | \(r\) | 28.05 | 19.73 | \(s\) | 2.50 | 0.40 | 0.03 |
Misha correctly used a suitable test to assess her belief.
You should clearly state your hypotheses, test statistic, critical value and conclusion. (6)
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| e.g. The probability of an arrow hitting the target is constant | B1 | 1.2/3.5b |
| e.g. The arrows are shot independently | B1 | 1.2/3.5b |
| (2) |
Notes
1st B1 for one suitable comment which must mention “arrows”/ “shots” / “hit” / “target”
or for both comments not in context
2nd B1 for both suitable comments which must mention “arrows”/ “shots”/“hit” / “target” at least once
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| \(\hat{p} = \dfrac{0 \times 1 + 1 \times 10 + 2 \times 30 + 3 \times 34 + 4 \times 17 + 5 \times 4 + 6 \times 2 + 7 \times 0 + 8 \times 2}{100 \times 8}\) | M1 | 1.1b |
| \(= \left[\dfrac{2.88}{8}\right] = \underline{\mathbf{0.36}}\) | A1 | 1.1b |
| (2) |
Notes
M1 for correct attempt at mean or \(\hat{p}\) (allow at least 3 correct non-zero products seen)
A1 for 0.36 (sight of 2.88 scores M1 and the A mark when divided by 8) (may be seen in (c))
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| [Let \(X \sim \mathrm{B}(8, \text{awrt } \text{“}0.36\text{”})\)] \(\mathrm{P}(X = 2) = 0.24936\ldots\) or \(\mathrm{P}(X = 5) = 0.08876\ldots\) | M1 | 3.4 |
| (E(2)) = awrt 24.94 (24.93~24.95) or (E(5)) = awrt 8.88 (8.87~8.89) | A1 | 1.1b |
| For using Sum of Expected frequencies = 100 (accept awrt 100.01) | B1ft | 1.1b |
| (3) |
Notes
M1 for sight or use of a correct binomial model to find either prob (ft their 0.36)
A1 for either correct expected frequency
B1ft for two positive values of \(r\) and \(s\) such that \(r + s = 33.82\) or 33.81
| Scheme | Marks | AO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (i) Need to pool some values to make all \(E_i \gt 5\) [Needn’t specify] | B1 | 1.1b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Two constraints AND \(p\) was estimated. [“2 constraints” \(\Leftarrow\ 5 - 2 = 3\)] | B1 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (ii) \(\mathrm{H}_0\): Binomial is a good model for these data \(\mathrm{H}_1\): Binomial is not a suitable model for these data | B1 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| M1 M1 | 1.1b/(2.1) 1.1b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Test statistic \(= 5.188692\ldots\) awrt 5.19 (allow awrt 5.18) | A1 | 1.1b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CV \(\chi_3^2(5\%) = 7.815\) | B1 | 1.1b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [Do not rej \(\mathrm{H}_0\)] Data is compatible with Misha’s belief /Binomial model is suitable | A1 | 2.2b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (15 marks) |
Notes
(i) 1st B1 for mention of the need to pool since \(E_i \lt 5\) or to get \(E_i \gt 5\)
2nd B1 for mention of 2 constraints because \(p\) is estimated/calculated (from data)
(ii) 1st B1 for both hypotheses correct
1st M1 for correct pooling (0&1) and (…5) (ft their \(r\) and \(s\)) (may be implied by awrt 5.18)
2nd M1 for correct use of test statistic (at least one correct calc to at least 2 sf from 3rd or 4th row)
1st A1 for awrt 5.19 (accept awrt 5.18, awrt 5.20)
2nd B1 for 7.815 (or better) [NB p-value = 0.1586 … and is B0]
2nd A1 dep on both M marks for a correct conclusion with “belief” or “binomial”
e.g \(\mathrm{B}(8, 0.36)\) is a suitable model is A1