A2 June 2019 Q1
1. Table 1 shows the cost, in pounds, of transporting one unit of stock from each of four supply points, A, B, C and D, to each of four demand points, P, Q, R and S. It also shows the stock held at each supply point and the stock required at each demand point. A minimum cost solution is required.
| P | Q | R | S | Supply | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 15 | 14 | 17 | 11 | 23 |
| B | 10 | 9 | 16 | 12 | 42 |
| C | 11 | 13 | 8 | 10 | 18 |
| D | 15 | 13 | 16 | 17 | 19 |
| Demand | 25 | 45 | 12 | 20 |
Table 1
Table 2 shows an initial solution given by the north-west corner method.
| P | Q | R | S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 23 | |||
| B | 2 | 40 | ||
| C | 5 | 12 | 1 | |
| D | 19 |
Table 2
- shadow costs
- improvement indices
- route
- entering cell and exiting cell.
| Scheme | Marks | AO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M1 1A1 | 2.1 1.1b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (2) |
Notes
1M1: A valid route, only one empty square used, \(\theta\)’s balance.
Note: If not entering in DQ, allow this mark for a valid route and entry in CP or DP only.
1A1: CAO
| Scheme | Marks | AO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M1 1A1 | 1.1b 1.1b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2M1 | 1.1b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entering cell is AS and exiting cell is DS | 2A1 | 2.2a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (4) |
Notes
1M1: Finding (exactly) 8 shadow costs and (exactly) 9 improvement indices for their improved solution
1A1: Shadow costs [Alt: A(15), B(10), C(7), D(14), P(0), Q(−1), R(1), S(3)] and II CAO. Please check top table for Shadow Costs.
2M1: A valid route, their most negative II chosen, only one empty square used, \(\theta\)’s balance
2A1: CAO – including the deduction of all entering and exiting cells
| Scheme | Marks | AO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M1 1A1 | 2.1 1.1b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A negative II so solution is not optimal | 2A1 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (3) |
Notes
1M1: finding all 8 shadow costs and all 9 negative improvement indices or sufficient number of shadow costs for at least 1 negative II found (May just see SC: A, C, P and S and II: PC). This mark is dependent on the previous M mark in (b) which will therefore indicate a correct mathematical argument leading from the initial solution to the confirmation or not of the optimality of the current solution
1A1: CAO negative II from correct working
2A1: CSO for (a), (b), (c) including the correct reasoning that the solution is not optimal because there is a negative II. Do not allow for ‘some IIs are not positive’ o.e. [Alt shadow costs: A(15), B(10), C(14), D(14), P(0), Q(−1), R(−6), S(−4)].
| Scheme | Marks | AO |
|---|---|---|
| (£)1086 | 1B1 | 1.1b |
| (1) | ||
| (10 marks) |
Notes
1B1: CAO ignore lack of or incorrect units.